Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6704 (UTT)

MANDEEP SANDHU v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/631/2024 · 2026-06-09

Alok Mahra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:4589 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL/631/2024 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Vishwast Kandpal proxy counsel for Ms. Medha Pande, learned counsel for the petitioner through Video Conferencing. 2. Mr. Shailendra Singh Chauahn, learned Deputy A.G. along with Mr. Vikash Uniyal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the Investigating Officer has already submitted a final report in the case before the competent Court, therefore, in view of the subsequent development, the relief sought in the present writ petition no longer survives for consideration. Thus, an application has been filed seeking permission to withdraw the present criminal writ petition. 4. Learned State Counsel does not dispute the aforesaid factual position. 5. Accordingly, the withdrawal application is allowed. 6. Consequently, the present criminal writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 7. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of accordingly. (Alok Mahra, J.) 09.06.2026 Mamta