Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6703 (CHH)

TUSHAR DEWANGAN v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/3206/2026 · 2026-04-12

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:16820 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3206 of 2026 1 - Tushar Dewangan S/o Hemram Dewangan Aged About 33 Years Posted As Computer Operator Cum Clerk Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit Cbs Section Civil Line Road, Behind Jhankar, Talkies, Keoramunda Ward Jagdalpur, District- Bastar (C.G.) 2 - Sameer Sahu S/o Ramswarup Sahu Aged About 36 Years Posted As Computer Operator Cum Clerk Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit Cbs Section Civil Line Road, Behind Jhankar, Talkies, Keoramunda Ward Jagdalpur, District- Bastar (C.G.) 3 - Vivek Sinha S/o Dinesh Kumar Aged About 36 Years Posted As Computer Operator Cum Clerk Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit Jagdalpur Main Road Branch Badekapsi District- Kanker (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Cooperative Societies Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Registrar Cooperative Societies Indrawati Bhawan Naya Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit , Through Its Chief Executive Officer, Jagdalpur, District- Bastar (C.G.) 4 - Girish Sharma Presently Posted As Computer Operator Cum Clerk Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit , Jagdalpur Branch Lakhanpur, District- Kanker (C.G.) 2 5 - Mordhwaj Tiwari Presently Posted As Computer Operator Cum Clerk Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit , Jagdalpur Field Section Civil Line Road Behind Jhankar Talkies , Keoramunda Ward Jagdalpur, District- Bastar (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vedant Shadangi, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Ms. Anuja Sharmaa, Dy. G.A. Hon’ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order on Board 13/04/2026 1. Learned State Counsel submits that there is an alternate remedy available with the petitioner of filing appropriate proceedings under the Co-operative Societies Act. Therefore, the present writ petition is not maintainable. 2. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner prays to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file appropriate application before appropriate forum. 3. In view of the above, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) JUDGE Madhurima