Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 67012 (MAD)

S.GIRIJA v. The Commissioner of Police

WP Crl./145/2026 · 2026-01-29

A D Jagadish Chandira

Writ Petition (Criminal)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.Crl.No.145 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29.01.2026 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA W.P.(Crl.)No.145 of 2026 S.Girija ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Commissioner of Police, O/o. Greater Avadi Police, Vepery, Chennai – 600 007. 2. The Inspector of Police, B4, Sevvaipet Police Station, Sevvaipet. 3. K.Suresh Babu 4. K.Arun Kumar 5. K.Saraswathy ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition (Criminal) is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Mandamus or direction in the nature of writ, to direct the first respondent to dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 06.12.2025 and initiate suitable proceedings against respondents 3 to 5 in accordance with law. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Bharathy For R1 & R2 : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan Additional Public Prosecutor 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.No.145 of 2026 O R D E R The present Writ Petition (Criminal) has been filed seeking a direction to the first respondent to dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 06.12.2025. 2. Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, takes notice on behalf of respondents 1 & 2. 3. In view of the consent expressed by the learned counsel on either side, this Writ Petition (Criminal) is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. Notice to respondents 3 to 5 is dispensed with inasmuch as no order prejudicial to their interest is passed. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the third respondent had received a hand loan from the petitioner to the tune of Rs.9 lakhs and cheated her. He further submitted that when the petitioner asked for the return of the said amount, the third respondent, along with his brother and mother, refused to return the same and absconded. Therefore, the petitioner gave a representation dated 06.12.2025 to the first respondent 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.No.145 of 2026 seeking action against respondents 3 to 5. Since no action has been taken on the petitioner’s representation, the present petition has been filed. 5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents 1 & 2 submitted that the representation of the petitioner dated 06.12.2025 was forwarded by the first respondent to the second respondent and that an enquiry was conducted on the said representation in C.S.R.No.747 of 2025 (C.No.43/B4 Crime/PG1(3)/APC/25) by the second respondent. He further submitted that the enquiry was subsequently closed on 12.01.2026 the dispute being civil in nature. 6. Recording the submissions made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this Writ Petition (Criminal) stands closed. No costs. However, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the closure report in the manner known to law, if so advised. 29.01.2026 ham Neutral Citation: Yes/No 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.No.145 of 2026 To 1. The Commissioner of Police, O/o. Greater Avadi Police, Vepery, Chennai – 600 007. 2. The Inspector of Police, B4, Sevvaipet Police Station, Sevvaipet. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.No.145 of 2026 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J. ham W.P.Crl.No.145 of 2026 29.01.2026 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis