VICKY PANDEY @ AJAY KUMAR PANDEY v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./1766/2026 · 2026-04-18
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6697 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6697 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:11231 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 1766 of 2026
------ Vicky Pandey @ Ajay Kumar Pandey, son of Dijan Pandey, resident of Village Okni New Area, P.O. Okni, P.S. Sadar, District Hazaribagh, permanent address: - Village Rahamkamta, P.O. and P.S. Tandwa, District Chatra
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
For the Petitioner
: Mr. P.C. Sinha, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, A.P.P.
------ 02/18.04.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Charhi P.S. Case No. 50 of 2021, registered for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 506, 307, 364 and 511 of the IPC, Sections 25(1-B) a/26 of the Arms Act and Section 17 of the C.L.A. Act, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Hazaribagh.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not gone to the spot and false allegation has been made against the petitioner and the name of the petitioner has come on the confessional statement. He further submits that he is not named in the FIR and in course of investigation the name of the petitioner has been surfaced. He also submits the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent as disclosed in para 10 of the petition. He next submits that two of the co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court in A.B.A. No. 8283 of
2021.
4. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the name of the petitioner has come on the confessional statement and the allegation is made that he is a member of banned organization.
5. Considering that two of the co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail and the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent as disclosed in para 10 of the petition and further the petitioner is not named in the FIR and the name of the petitioner has come in course of investigation, in that view of the matter, the petitioner, named above, is directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks from today and the learned Court shall release the petitioner on such terms and conditions or the sureties as the learned Court may deem fit and proper.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Anit Uploaded 20.04.2026