Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6693 (MAD)

B.CHITRA v. The Commissioner of Land Administrator

WP/9588/2026 · 2026-03-13

M Dhandapani

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 9588 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI WP No. 9588 of 2026 1. B.Chitra 2. N. Vedhamurthy 3. K. Sellaiyan 4. P.Saravanan 5. C. Moovendan 6. P. Kuttimani 7. C. Chozhan 8. K. Madhavan ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Commissioner of Land Administrator Ezhilagam Chepauk, Chennai 600 005. 2. The District collector Collectorate, tiruvaruru Distrct, Tiruvarur 3. The revenue Divisional officer Office of the RDO Tiuvarur District 4. The Tahsildar Taluk office, Koothanallur and Post, Tiruvarur District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 9588 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 6 5. The Special Tahsildar (Natham Nilavarithittam), Taluk office, Koothanallur Taluk, Tiruvarur District 6. The Joint Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments, Nagapattinam 7. The Executive officer Arulmigu Sundareeswarar Temple, Thirupanipettai, Koothallur Taluk, Tiruvaur District ..Respondent(s) The writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorarified Mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining to the proceedings of the Joint Commissioner, the 6th respondent herein, in M.P. No 165/ 2025 / C.2 dated 5.3.2025, M.P. no 148 / 2025 / C.2 / dated 5.3.2025, M.P. no 147/2025/ C.2/ dated 5.3.2025, MP.No 164/2025/ C.2 / dated 5.3.2025, MP.No 141 /2025/ C.2 / dated 5.3.2025, MP.No 167/2025/ C.2 / dated 5.3.2025, MP.No 160 /2025/ C.2 / dated 5.3.2025, MP.No 126/2025/ C.2 / dated 5.3.2025 and to quash the same consequently direct the Joint commissioner, the 6th respondent herein, as not to interfere in the lawful and peaceful possession of the housing sites for which the pattas were issued to the petitioners under the natham nilavari thittam by the government of Tamil nadu. For Petitioner(s): Mr. K.M.Subramanian For Respondent(s): Mr.N.R.R.Arun Natarajan, SGP RR6 & 7 Mr.S.Rajesh, GA RR1 to 5 ORDER The petitioner has filed the present writ petition challenging the show https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 9588 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 6 cause notice dated 05.03.2025 issued by the respondents as if the petitioners have occupied the temple properties and subsequently, they have obtained ryotwari patta and conducted buildings. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the respondents have passed the final order in the issue and this Court may grant liberty to the petitioner to challenge the final order dated 05.11.2025 passed by the respondents. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to challenge the final order dated 05.11.2025 in the manner known to law.No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 13-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RLI https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 9588 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 6 1. The Commissioner of Land Administrator Ezhilagam Chepauk, Chennai 600 005 2. The District collector Collectorate, tiruvaruru Distrct, Tiruvarur 3. The revenue Divisional officer Office of the RDO Tiuvarur District 4. The Tahsildar Taluk office, Koothanallur and Post, Tiruvarur District 5. The Special Tahsildar (nathamNilavarithittam), Taluk office, Koothanallur Taluk, Tiruvarur District 6. The Joint Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments, Nagapattinam 7. The Executive officer Arulmigu Sundareeswarar Temple, Thirupanipettai, Koothallur Taluk, Tiruvaur District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 9588 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 6 M.DHANDAPANI, J. RLI WP No. 9588 of 2026 13-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 9588 of 2026 __________ Page6 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis