DAYARAM @ DAYANAND S/O SURAJBHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/10718/2025 · 2026-04-06
Ganesh Ram Meena
Public Interest Litigationbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6691 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6691 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:14147] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10718/2025 Dayaram @ Dayanand S/o Surajbhan, R/o Pehal, Police Station Mundawar, District Khairtal Tijara, Rajasthan. (At Present In Sub Jail, Kishangarhbas). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahaveer Singh on behalf of Mr. Harendra Singh Sinsinwar For Complainant(s) For State : : Mr. Dharmendra Kumar on behalf of Mr. Kapil Gupta Ms. Sampati Sharma Mr. Shriram Dhakad, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 06/04/2026
1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.514/2024 registered with the Police Station Mundawar, District Khairthal-Tijara for offence under Sections 103(1), 351(3) and 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023.
2. Heard.
3. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor as well as the learned counsels for the complainant.
4. The learned counsel for the accused-petitioner that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he is in custody since 04.10.2024. He further submits that the Police
[2026:RJ-JP:14147] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-10718/2025] after completion of investigation, has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and the trial of the case is likely to take considerable time to conclude, therefore, the accused-petitioner may be enlarged on bail.
5. The learned Public Prosecutor assisted by the learned counsels for the complainant has opposed the bail application and submit that there is specific allegation against the present petitioner of inflicting injury on the neck of the deceased, Lokesh, with a Kulhari.
6. On perusal of the postmortem report of the deceased, Lokesh, the cause of death opined is due to Hemorrhagic Shock as a result of massive bleeding. As per the contents of the First Information Report, there is specific allegation against the present petitioner of inflicting injury on the neck of deceased, Lokesh, with a Kulhari, which is a sharp edged weapon.
7. Taking into consideration the specific allegation against the present accused-petitioner and so also the cause of death, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
8. Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /6