2026:UHC:4645 1 HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition Service Single No. 1535 of 2026 10 June, 2026 Mohammad Shamin --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand and Others --Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. Vinod Nautiyal, learned counsel for petitioner, through V.C. Mr. S.S. Chaudhary, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand/respondents. Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. (Oral) Petitioner has challenged the transfer order dated 06.06.2025 (Annexure No.6 to the writ petition) passed by respondent No.2, whereby, petitioner was transferred from Treasury, Udham Singh Nagar to Sub- treasury, Khatima. 2. It is submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that pursuant to transfer order, petitioner has already joined in Khatima on 09.06.2025. 3. Since, impugned transfer order has already been executed and the petitioner has come to this Court after a lapse of one year, therefore, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter exercising its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition fails and is accordingly dismissed in-limine. 5. Pending application also stands disposed of. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 10.06.2026 PN