Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6688 (UTT)

DINESH KUMAR v. SURAJ PRAKASH GULATI

CLR/124/2017 · 2026-06-09

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:4606 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS Withdrawal Application (IA No.11968 of 2026) In CLR/124/2017 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Siddhartha Singh, Advocate for the revisionists. 2. Mr. Nikhil Joshi, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Piyush Garg, Advocate for the respondents. 3. In this revision filed under Section 25 of Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887, revisionists have challenged the judgment and order dated 24.08.2017, passed by learned Judge, Small Cause Court/First Additional District Judge, Rishikesh, Dehradun in SCC Case No. 23 of 2015. 4. Today, the matter is listed on a withdrawal application. 5. Learned counsel for the revisionists submits that in view of compromise entered into between the parties, revisionists do not want to press the civil revision anymore and they be permitted to withdraw the revision. 6. For the reasons indicated in the withdrawal application, the same is allowed. 7. Consequently, the Civil Revision is dismissed as withdrawn. 8. Pending Application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 09.06.2026 Navin