Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6688 (BOM)

ASAVARI AKSHAY MINDE MAIDEN NAME ROHINI DIGAMBAR JADHAV v. AKSHAY GOKUL MINE

MCA/80/2026 · 2026-09-02

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

52-MCA-80-2026.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 80 OF 2026 Asavari Akshay Minde Maiden Name Rohini Digambar Jadhav …Applicant Vs. Akshay Gokul Mine. …Respondent Mr. Darshan Patankar i/b. Mr. Yogesh D. for the applicant. Mr. Sachin Pawar i/b. Mr. Tejas Mane for the respondent. CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATE : 2nd SEPTEMBER 2026 ORDER : 1. Learned counsel for the respective parties submit that the mediation is successful and the parties have signed the consent terms before the learned mediator. The consent terms along with the mediator’s report is placed on record. In view of the consent terms, the respondent / husband has agreed to withdraw the petition filed for restitution of conjugal rights. 2. The consent terms submitted along with the mediator’s report are taken on record and marked as ‘X’ with today’s 1/2 Swapnil 52-MCA-80-2026.docx date for identification. 3. The consent terms records the statement of the respondent’s husband that on the next date assigned before the trial court, he would withdraw the petition for restitution of conjugal rights. 4. The statements recorded in the consent terms are accepted as an assurance and undertaking to this court. 5. In view of the consent terms, nothing further survives in the miscellaneous civil application. 6. The miscellaneous civil application, is therefore, disposed of in terms of the consent terms. [GAURI GODSE, J.] 2/2