Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 66877 (MAD)

S.RAJU v. The State of Tamilnadu

WP/3236/2026 · 2026-02-04

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 3236 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 3236 of 2026 S.Raju ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State of Tamilnadu Rep by its secretary to Government land Administration and Rural Development department, Fort St George, Chennai 2. The District collector Collectorate, Government Garden tirupathur 3. The Tahsildar Natrampalli Taluk, Tirupathur District 4. The Revenue Divisional officer Tirupathru Division,Tirupathur ..Respondent(s) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 3236 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 Directing the respondents to grant patta to the land situated in S/ No. 5 at Kothur Village, Natrampalli Taluk, Thirupathur District by considering the petitioners represetnation dated 14.06.2024 within time frame. For Petitioner(s): Ms.K.Jenitha For Respondent(s): Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja Govt Advocate Order This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents to issue patta in favour of the petitioner for the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, based on the petitioner's representation dated 14.06.2024, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2.The petitioner has filed supporting documents along with this writ petition in support of the petitioner's representation seeking for issuance of patta in his name. 3.Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 3236 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 4.No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s representation, as stated supra, is considered, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving due consideration to the documents produced by the petitioner, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 5.This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation. 6.Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the third respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's representation dated 14.06.2024 seeking for issuance of patta for the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections of the neighbouring land owners or any other third party, if any, whom the third respondent deems it fit to enquire, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 04-02-2026 VGA https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 3236 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. VGA To 1. The State of Tamilnadu Rep by its secretary to Government land Administration and Rural Development department, Fort St George, Chennai 2. The District collector Collectorate, Government Garden tirupathur 3. The Tahsildar Natrampalli Taluk, Tirupathur District 4. The Revenue Divisional officer Tirupathru Division,Tirupathur WP No. 3236 of 2026 04-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis