Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6687 (ALL)

GULSHAN CHANDRA v. STATE OF UP

BAIL/32009/2026 · 2026-09-08

Krishan Pahal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32009 of 2026 Court No. - 68 (Sr. No.118 out of 318) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Ram Mohan Tiwari, Advocate holding brief of Sri Anil Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Deepak Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.05 of 2026, under Sections 109(1) BNS and Section 4/25 Arms Act, Police Station Sunngarhi, District Kasganj, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is true that injured sustained several injuries, but in the opinion of the doctor, the injuries were simple in nature, as per the supplementary report of the injured person, which has been filed as Annexure-3 to the affidavit filed with bail application. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant has further argued that the FIR is delayed by about one day and there is no proper explanation of the said delay caused either. The applicant is languishing in jail since 2.2.2026 and she is ready to cooperate with trial. In case, the applicant is released on bail, she will not misuse the liberty of bail. 6. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anil Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Gulshan Chandra .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, taking into consideration the delay in institution of FIR coupled with the fact that injuries sustained by the injured person were simple in nature, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima facie the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant- Gulshan Chandra, be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that she shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required. 9. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. September 9, 2026 Vikas Verma BAIL No. 32009 of 2026 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIKAS VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad