[2026:RJ-JP:13937] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2892/2026 Dhan Singh Meena S/o Shri Kamlesh Meena, R/o Village Kunkata Kalan, Police Station Sadar Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anshuman Saxena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP, Mr. Suresh Gurjar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 02/04/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 960/2025 registered at Police Station Sanganer Sadar, District Jaipur City (South) for the offences under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and the charge-sheet has already been submitted. It is also contended that apart from the oral statement of the complainant, there is no substantive evidence to the fact that petitioner has transferred the amount from the account of complainant to various persons. The accused-petitioner is in custody since 20.01.2025 and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. [2026:RJ-JP:13937] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2892/2026] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application and contended that an amount of Rs.21,46,083/- was transferred in the account of Sumit Mali and Rajnikant Sharma. It is also contended that the petitioner is residing as a tenant of the complainant, who is illiterate and a widow lady. It is contended that the petitioner by deceiving the complainant has used her mobile phone and transferred an amount of Rs.21,46,083/- into various accounts. It is also contended that petitioner is a habitual offender and he has already been convicted for offence under Sections 354(b) and 457 of IPC and was sentenced to undergo three years rigorous imprisonment and two more cases are pending against the petitioner for similar offence under Sections 354(a), 354(b), 354(g), 509 of the IPC read with Section 67 and 67a of the IT Act and Sections 430 and 406 of the IPC, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the fact that the complainant in her statement rendered under Section 180 of BNSS has clearly stated that her husband and son died and she got the claim of Rs.21,44,640/- from electricity department and present petitioner was residing as a tenant. The complainant has also stated that she is illiterate and the petitioner was operating her account through the mobile and she came to know about the transfer of huge amount from her account on 07.12.2025 when she went to the bank for withdrawal of the amount. The amount from the petitioner's account was transferred to various accounts including the account of other co- accused who have also been named in the FIR. Moreover, the [2026:RJ-JP:13937] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2892/2026] petitioner is having a criminal background and he was convicted for the offence under Sections 354(b) and 457 of IPC and two other cases including a case under Sections 430 and 406 of IPC is also pending against the petitioner, therefore, considering the aforesaid facts, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the accused- petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application of the accused-petitioner is hereby dismissed. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/60