Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6682 (ORI)

PRAMILA NAYAK v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/8834/2026 · 2026-04-24

Sashikanta Mishra

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 8834 of 2026 Pramila Nayak …. Petitioner Represented by Mr. A. K. Panda, Advocate -Versus – State of Odisha and others …. Opp. Parties Represented by Mrs. J.Sahoo, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA ORDER_ 24.04.2026 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State. 3. The limited grievance of the petitioner is that on his application, the Tahasildar, Kalyansinghpur directed the concerned Revenue Inspector, Bijaynagar to demarcate the land in question within seven days. Such order was communicated to the Revenue Inspector on 06.07.2024, but has not yet been carried out. 4. The Tahasildar cannot sit as a mute spectator to the continued inaction of the Revenue Inspector in implementing his order. The Tahasildar shall ensure that the demarcation process shall be completed within two weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order by the petitioner. The writ petition is disposed of directing the Tahasildar, Kalyansinghpur to ensure early implementation of his order by the concerned R.I. (Sashikanta Mishra) B.C. Tudu Judge Order No. 1. Designation: Sr. Stenographer