Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:HHC:14338 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 6533 of 2026.
Date of decision: 04.05.2026. _____________________________________________________________________________ Bidhi Chand
...Petitioner.
Versus
State of H.P. and Ors.
…Respondents. ____________________________________________________________________________
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting? 1 _____________________________________________________________________________
For the Petitioner. Mr. Shriyek Sharda, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General along with Mr. Raj Negi, Deputy Advocate General. __________________________________________________________ Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to file afresh on the same cause of action with better particulars, as a fresh notice has been served upon the petitioner after filing of the present petition.
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
2. Prayer is accepted and petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed, along with pending application, if any.
(Vivek Singh Thakur),
Judge.
(Ranjan Sharma),
Judge. 04th May, 2026 (Kiran)