PUSHPENDRA SINGH S/O PRATAP SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/17034/2025 · 2026-03-24
Sameer Jain
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6672 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6672 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:12218] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 17034/2025 Pushpendra Singh S/o Pratap Singh, R/o Village Shayaroli, Police Station Wazirpur, District Swaimadhopur. ----Applicant Versus State of Rajasthan through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order 24/03/2026
1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 181/2025 registered at Police Station Wazirpur District Sawai Madhopur for the offence(s) under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 332(c), 352, 78(2) of BNS, 2023, Section 66 of IT Act, 2000, Section 11 and 12 of POCSO Act, 2012.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that vide order dated 16.01.2026, the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court has granted interim protection to the applicant. It is further submitted that the present is a case of registration of cross FIRs wherein prior to registration of the present FIR, an FIR No.180/2025 dated 20.10.2025 came to be registered wherein charge-sheet has already been filed. It is further submitted that the present FIR is lodged at a belated stage with a delay of approximately six days from the date of incident. It is further
[2026:RJ-JP:12218] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-17034/2025] submitted that the registration of the present FIR is nothing but an afterthought.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant have opposed the bail application. It is submitted by learned counsel for the complainant that vide
order dated 22.12.2025, the Superintendent of Police has declared a price of Rs.5,000/- qua the applicant. It is next submitted that serious allegations of causing grievous injuries have been levelled against the applicant.
4. Having heard the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the parties, considering that the accused-applicant has already joined investigation as and when directed vide interim order dated 16.01.2026, taking note of the fact that the present is a case of cross FIRs; that the present FIR has been registered with a delay of approximately six days, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court deems it appropriate to make the order dated 16.01.2026 absolute and allow the anticipatory bail application.
5. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Wazirpur District Sawai Madhopur in F.I.R. No. 181/2025 is directed that in the event of arrest of the accused-applicant Pushpendra Singh S/o Pratap Singh shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:-
[2026:RJ-JP:12218] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-17034/2025] (i) that the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the applicant shall not leave India without prior permission of the Court.
(SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/7