HANSRAM @ HANSA S/O SHRI BHERO SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/5531/2026 · 2026-04-17
Pramil Kumar Mathur
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6670 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6670 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:16180] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5531/2026 Hansram @ Hansa S/o Shri Bhero Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Bholapura, Police Station Badi Sadar, District Dholpur. At Present Is Confined To Judicial Custody At Central Jail, Sewar, District Bharatpur. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Assistant Public Prosecutor No. 2, Bayana. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arun Sharma Ms. Nidhi Mathur Mr. Puneet Garg For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 17/04/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.249/2023 registered at Police Station Rudawal, District Bharatpur for offences under Section 4/21 of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, Section 379 IPC and Section 3/25 of Arms Act.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is submitted that the allegations levelled against the present petitioner pertain to offences under the MMDR Act relating to the alleged transportation of gravel (bajri). It is further submitted that the co-accused-
[2026:RJ-JP:16180] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5531/2026] Devisingh @ Ramswaroop has been enlarged on bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court vide order dated
15.06.2023. The petitioner has been in judicial custody since
18.02.2026. It is also submitted that though 12 criminal cases have been registered against the petitioner but the petitioner has been acquitted in 4 cases and in the remaining 8 cases, he has already been granted bail. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Hansram @ Hansa S/o Shri Bhero Singh, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/40