- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9295 WP No. 21879 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO.21879 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SAPPHIRE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT PVT. LTD., A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.366 1ST CROSS, 3RD BLOCK KORAMANGALA SARJAPUR ROAD BENGALURU-560 034 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY SRI.A.BASAVARAJ S/O LATE MALKAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS …PETITIONER (BY SRI.NARAYAN RAO, ADVOCATE FOR SRI.RAJESWARA P.N, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560001 Digitally signed by AL BHAGYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9295 WP No. 21879 of 2025 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU SOUTH SUB-DIVISION BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT KANDAYA BHAVANA K.G.ROAD, BENGALURU-560009 3. THE TAHSILDAR ANEKAL TALUK, ANEKAL BENGALURU-562106 4. VIJAYA KUMAR S S/O SRINIVASACHARI AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/AT NO.119, BASAVASREE GANESH MANDIR ROAD TYAGARAJANAGAR BSK 2ND STAGE BENGALURU - 560070 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.KIRAN KUMAR, HCGP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALLING FOR RECORDS IN W.P.NO.28202/2024 (KLR-RES) AND DECLARE THAT THE ORDER DATED 21.01.2025 PASSED IN W.P.NO.28202/2024 (KLR-RES) BY THIS HONBLE COURT AT ANNEXURE-A IS NOT BINDING ON THE PETITIONER AS IT ADVERSELY AFFECTS THE INTEREST OF THE PETITIONER THOUGH THE PETITIONER WAS NOT PARTY TO THE SAID PROCEEDINGS AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9295 WP No. 21879 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 16.02.2026 seeking disposal of the petition. 2. On reading the memo, it is forthcoming that post remand, the claim of respondent No.4, who was the petitioner in W.P.No.28202/2024, is rejected by respondent No.3 on merits. It is, in this background, a memo is filed indicating that the relief sought in the captioned petition is rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed off. Since post remand, respondent No.4 has suffered orders at the hands of respondent No.3. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE NBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14