Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6668 (CHH)

GULAM NABI RAIN v. UNION OF INDIA

WPS/2217/2022 · 2026-04-16

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:17609 NAFR HIGH COURT of CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2217 of 2022 Gulam Nabi Rain S/o Mohd. Ramjan Rain, Aged About 53 Years At Present R/o. House No. 1406, Ward No. 11, Kailash Nagar, G.E. Road, Kumhari, Dhamdha, District Durg (Chhattisgarh), District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - Union of India Through The Secretary, Ministry of Personnel, P.G. And Training, Government of India, North Block, New Delhi, District : New Delhi, Delhi. 2 - Director, Ministry of Personnel, P.G. And Training, Government of India, North Block, New Delhi, District : New Delhi, Delhi. 3 - State of Madhya Pradesh Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Ballabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.), District : Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh. 4 - Secretary, General Administration Department, State of M.P., Mantralaya, Ballabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.), District : Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh. 5 - Deputy Secretary, General Administration Department (State Reorganization Cell), State of M.P., Mantralaya, Ballabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.), District : Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh. 6 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Urban Administration And Development Department, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 7 - Director, Urban Administration And Development Department, State of Chhattisgarh, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 8 - Secretary, General Administration Department, State of Chhattisgarh, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 9 - Secretary, Education Department, State of Chhattisgarh, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 10 - Director, Public Educational Directorate, State of Chhattisgarh, Atal 2 Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 11 - District Educaton officer, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Mahesh Verma, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Arham Siddiqui, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ramakant Mishra, Deputy Solicitor General Mr. Abhyuday Tripathi, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 17/04/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the Respondent Authorities to transfer the petitioner from the State of Chhattisgarh back to his original State i.e Chatarpur (Madhya Pradesh) in view of the Inter State Transfer, in the interest of justice. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the Respondent Authorities to take a decision in this matter at the earliest available opportunity in a time bound manner. 10.3 That, any other relief, in light of the facts and circumstances of the case may also be granted in favor of the petitioner.” 2. The petitioner was appointed on the post of Shiksha Karmi Grade-III in the State of Madhya Pradesh in the year 1999, and his services were transferred to the State of Chhattisgarh vide order dated 01.09.2007. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner made a representation on 24.09.2016 before the respondent No.2 to transfer his services back to the State of Madhya Pradesh, but till date no decision has been taken. 3 4. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the respondents would oppose the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner and submit that the order dated 01.09.2007 has already been executed, and at present, the petitioner is working within the State of Chhattisgarh. They would further submit that by efflux of time, this petition has rendered infructuous. 5. Heard. 6. Taking into consideration the fact that the representation made by the petitioner dated 24.09.2016 is still pending consideration before respondent No. 2, at this juncture, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents No. 1 and 2 to consider and decide the representation dated 24.09.2016 expeditiously. 7. With the aforesaid observation(s) and direction(s), this writ petition is hereby disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Rakesh Mohan Pandey JUDGE Nadim