Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 66674 (MAD)

Suseelarani and 2 others v. S. Kesavan and 3 others

A/549/2026 · 2026-02-05

P Dhanabal

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

A No. 549 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL A No. 549 of 2026 in C.S.No.178 of 2025 1. Suseelarani W/o.Ramachandran (Late) residing at No.30/7, Telegraph Abboy Street, Kondithope, Chennai 600 001. 2. A.Nalini W/o.Late Srinivasan, 1-138, Elementary School, Bangarpet, Venkatagiri, Tirupathi District 524 404. 3. Kamalakannan S/o.Krishnamoorthy, Presently residing at No.30/7, Telegraph Abboy Street, Kondithope, Chennai 600 001 permanently residing at Old No.49, New No.6, Perumal Mudali Street, Kondithope, Chennai 600 001. ..Applicant(s) Vs 1. S. Kesavan residing at No.15/8, Sudharsan 5th Street, Kondithope, Chennai 600 001. 2. Y.Meenakshi W/o.Y.Lakshmi Narashimhulu, Residing at Old No.11, New No.21, Muniappa Mudali Street, Kondithope, Chennai 600 001. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 549 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 3. M.Vinoth Kumar S/o.P.Muthukrishnan, residing at Door No.41/77, Thirupalli Street, Sowcarpet, Chennai 600 001. 4. Lakshmi Narayanan S/o.Krishnamoorthy, residing at Old No.49, New NO.6, Perumal Mudali Street, Kondithope, Chennai 600 001. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Application filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S.Rules r/w Order VI Rule 17 of CPC to amend the address for service of the 1st respondent / 1st defendant in C.S.No.178 of 2025 For Applicant(s): Mr.P.S. Amalraj For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Bala Singh for R2 and R3 ORDER This application has been filed by the applicants / plaintiffs to amend the address for service of the 1st respondent / 1st defendant in C.S.No.178 of 2025. 2. According to the applicants, they are the plaintiffs in the main suit. Earlier the 1st applicant / 1st defendant was residing at No.15/8, Sudharsan 5th Street, Kondithope, Chennai – 600 001, and the applicants / plaintiffs came to https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 549 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 know that the 1st applicant / 1st defendant is residing at “No.15/8, Sundaram Mudali Street, Kondithope, 5th Street / Lane, Kondithope, VOC Nagar, Chennai – 79, therefore, the correct address of the 1st defendant has to be mentioned in the plaint, therefore, filed this application. 3. Heard the learned counsel appearing on both sides and perused the documents placed on record. 4. Considering the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the application and taking note of the fact that notice has not been served to the 1st respondent / 1st defendant so far and now only the applicants came to know about the correct address of the 1st defendant, viz., “No.15/8, Sundaram Mudali Street, Kondithope, 5th Street / Lane, Kondithope, VOC Nagar, Chennai – 79, and since the correct address has to be mentioned in the plaint, this application is allowed. Post the matter on 20.02.2026 after carrying out necessary amendment. 05-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No ssd https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 549 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 P.DHANABAL, J. ssd A No. 549 of 2026 in C.S.No.178 of 2025 05-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis