[2026:RJ-JP:12995] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4046/2026 Datar Singh Shekhawat S/o Shri Hazari Singh Shekhawat, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village Post Mavta, Tehsil Udaipurvati, Police Station Udaipurvati, District Jhunjhunu Presently Resident Of Plot No. 15, Krishna Dham Second, Ganesh Vatika Ke Pas, Vaidhji Ka Chauraha, Nivaru Road Police Station Kardhani, Jaipur Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surya Pratap Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 27/03/2026 1. This bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.98/2025 registered at Police Station Jalupura, District Jaipur City (North) for offences punishable under Sections 420, 406 & 120B of IPC. After completion of investigation, police filed charge-sheet in this matter. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel contends that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. It is contended that after thorough investigation, police submitted charge-sheet in this matter for offences punishable under Sections 420, 406 & 120B of IPC. It is contended that in another FIR [2026:RJ-JP:12995] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-4046/2026] No.713/2023 registered at Police Station Jhotwara, petitioner was arrested on 04.11.2023. Learned counsel submits that in the present case, petitioner has been arrested on 19.09.2025 and his custody was secured through production warrant. Learned counsel submits that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioner. He submits that though only three other cases have been shown in the impugned order but a total of 14 cases have been registered against the petitioner however, he fairly concedes that petitioner was taken into custody on 04.11.2023. 4. Heard. Perused the material available on record. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, especially considering the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate as also taking note of the fact that petitioner was arrested on 04.11.2023 in connection with FIR No.713/2023 registered at Police Station Jhotwara and in the present case, his custody has been secured through production warrant on 19.09.2025, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of this case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Datar Singh Shekhawat S/o Shri Hazari Singh Shekhawat, shall be released on bail provided he [2026:RJ-JP:12995] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-4046/2026] furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that after being released in all the cases, the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in the first week of every month in the concerned police station, till trial is concluded. 8. Concerned SHO shall enter attendance of the petitioner in the Roznamcha. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. 10. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance. 11. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /56