[2026:RJ-JP:12139] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18513/2025 1. Smt. Anita Vyas Daughter Of Shri Shyam Sunder Sharma, Resident Of A-89, Vidhya Nagar, Jagatpura, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur-302017. Other Address Anita Vyas Daughter Of Shri Shyam Sunder Sharma, Resident Of S-1,/p No. 82, Vinayak Enclave, Near Gyan Vihar University, Narsinghpura, Jagatpura, Jaipur-302017 (Raj.) Other (Office) Address Anita Vyas Daughter Of Shri Shyam Sunder Sharma, Teacher, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Ghati Karolan, Kho-Nagorian, Jaipur (Rajasthan) (Employee Id Rjjp200518002386). 2. Brij Kishore Bhardwaj Son Of Shri Ram Gopal Sharma, Resident Of Plot No.26, Tatkaleshwarputi, Hida Ki Mori, Jaipur-302003, Raj. Other (Office) Address Brij Kishore Bhardwaj Son Of Shri Ram Gopal Bhardwaj, Teacher, Government Higher Secondary School, Ghati Karolan, Kho-Nagorian, Jaipur, Rajasthan (Employee Id No. Rjjp198818018074). ----Non-Applicant-Petitioners Versus 1. S.K. Finance Ltd., Regional Office Plot No. 36, Dhuleshwar Garden, C-Scheme, Jaipur Through Authorised Officer Amit Jangid. ……...Applicant-Respondent 2. District Education Officer Cum District Project Convenor, Samagra Shiksha, Jaipur. ----Proforma-Respondent For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naman Yadav HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 23/03/2026 1. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners. [2026:RJ-JP:12139] (2 of 2) [CW-18513/2025] 2. By filing the instant writ petition, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 20.01.2025 passed by the learned District and Sessions Judge, Jaipur Metropolitan-I on an application filed by them under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter is to be referred to as ‘the Act of 1996’). 3. As per the provision of Section 37(1)(b) of the Act of 1996, the order passed on application under Section 9 of the Act of 1996 granting or refusing to grant any measure, a person aggrieved can prefer an appeal. 4. Since the petitioners are having an alternative statutory remedy of appeal against the impugned order, this Court is not inclined to exercise its writ jurisdiction unless the petitioners first avail the alternative statutory remedy of appeal. 5. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed. 6. The stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /14