Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:12253] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1309/2026 Munsad S/o Bhuttu, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Dantka, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2589/2026 Mafar S/o Islam, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Mothuka, Police Station Pahari, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal Mr. Arafat Hussain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, AGA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 24/03/2026
1. The petitioners have filed these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.2/2026 registered at Police Station Pahari, District Deeg for offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2)(a) of BNS, 2023 and Section 66-D of IT Act, 2008.
[2026:RJ-JP:12253] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1309/2026]
2. Since both these bail applications arise out of common FIR, hence, they are being decided by this common order.
3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. Co- accused-Nisar, Gambhir and Mujahidin have been enlarged on bail by Coordinate Bench of this Court on 17.03.2026. The case of the present petitioners are akin to them. Petitioners are behind the bars since 01.01.2026 without any criminal past. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, accordingly, the bail applications deserves to be allowed.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications.
6. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submissions made by
learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners.
7. Consequently, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Munsad S/o Bhuttu and Mafar S/o Islam, be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that
[2026:RJ-JP:12253] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1309/2026] each of them shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/28-29