SUNIL RANJAN SAMANTRAY v. RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, MUMBAI
WP(C)/5801/2026 · 2026-04-29
B P Routray
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6663 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6663 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.5801 of 2026
Sunil Ranjan Samantray & Anr. …. Petitioners Mr. K.Nanda, Advocate -versus- Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai & Ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr. R.Panigrahy, Advocate for O.P.8 & 9
CORAM:
SHRI JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
ORDER 29.04.2026
Order No.
02.
1. Heard Mr. Nanda, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. Panigrahy, learned counsel for Opposite Parties 8 & 9.
2. Considering the limited prayer of the Petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission with a direction to the Appellate Authority, Consumer Education and Protection Department, Reserve Bank of India (O.P.No.7) to dispose of the appeal of Petitioner as per Annexure-9, in accordance with law, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order along with a copy of the writ petition.
3. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.
( B.P. Routray) Judge
S.Das