Page No.# 1/3 GAHC020000942026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/25/2026 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. HAVING ITS REGISTRED AND HEAD OFFICE AT PREMISES NO. 18 - 0374, PLOT NO. CBD-81, NEW TOWN, KOLKATA - 700156 AND REGIONAL AND DIVISIONAL OFFICES IN SEVERAL PLACES, INCLUDING A REGIONAL OFFICE AT GUWAHATI, ASSAM AND A BUSINESS OFFICE AT DIMAPUR IN THE STATE OF NAGALAND VERSUS SMTI. APU SEN AND 2 ORS M/O LATE ANUP SEN, C/O KRIPAL BAIDYA, T.K. COMPLEX, ARMY ROAD, P.S. SUB-URBAN, DIMAPUR, NAGALAND (MOTHER OF THE DECEASED) 2:SHRI BIJOY NINGTHOUJAM S/O N. JUGOL SINGH R/O SAGOLBAND BIJOY GOVINDA P.S. IMPHAL WEST MANIPUR - 795004 (OWNER OF THE OFFENDING VEHICLE) 3:SHRI MIRRANGTHEM JACOB MEITEI S/O JAISKUL MEITEI R/O AWANG LEIKINTHABI VILLAGE P.S. SEKMAI IMPHAL EAST MANIPUR - 79513 Advocate for the Petitioner : MHALE WEO, Advocate for the Respondent : , Page No.# 2/3 Linked Case : MACApp./3/2026 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD HAVING ITS REGISTRED AND HEAD OFFICE AT PREMISES NO. 18 - 0374 PLOT NO. CBD-81 NEW TOWN KOLKATA - 700156 AND REGIONAL AND DIVISIONAL OFFICES IN SEVERAL PLACES INCLUDING A REGIONAL OFFICE AT GUWAHATI ASSAM AND A BUSINESS OFFICE AT DIMAPUR IN THE STATE OF NAGALAND VERSUS SMTI APU SEN AND 2 ORS M/O LATE ANUP SEN C/O KRIPAL BAIDYA T.K. COMPLEX ARMY ROAD P.S. SUB-URBAN DIMAPUR NAGALAND (MOTHER OF THE DECEASED) 2:SHRI BIJOY NINGTHOUJAM S/O N. JUGOL SINGH R/O SAGOLBAND BIJOY GOVINDA P.S. IMPHAL WEST MANIPUR - 795004 (OWNER OF THE OFFENDING VEHICLE) 3:SHRI MIRRANGTHEM JACOB MEITEI S/O JAISKUL MEITEI R/O AWANG LEIKINTHABI VILLAGE P.S. SEKMAI IMPHAL EAST MANIPUR - 795136 ------------ Advocate for : KEDUVI ZHOTSO Advocate for : appearing for SMTI APU SEN AND 2 ORS Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER ORDER Date : 26.05.2026 Learned counsel, Ms. Medo Kikhi is present for the applicant. Learned counsel, Mr. Xepe submits that he will be entering appearance for the claimant/R-1. 2. The instant application has been filed by the applicant praying for condonation of delay of 49 (forty-nine) days in filing the connected MACApp./3/2026. 3. The reasons for the delay has been set out at paragraph-7 of the instant application. 4. This Court has perused the pleadings and has found that sufficient cause has been shown by the applicant for the delay of 49 days. Accordingly, the application is allowed and the delay of 49 days in filing the connected MACApp./3/2026 is condoned. 5. Application stands allowed and disposed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant