Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 666 (HP)

JEEVAN KUMAR v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/1826/2026 · 2026-02-12

Romesh Verma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:HHC:3481 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No. 1826 of 2026 Decided on : 12.02.2026 _______________________________________________________ Jeevan Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Others ...Respondents ________________________________________________________ Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Vacation Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Suri, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Romesh Verma, Judge (Oral) The petitioner has approached this Court for the following main relief: “That the respondents may kindly be directed to consider the representations i.e. Annexure P-2, P-3 & P-4 of the petitioner within time bound manner and transferred the petitioner against the available vacancy of TGT(NM) i.e. (1) GSSS Jawer (2) GHS Kuthera Kherla, District Una, (3) GMS Amro u/c GSSS Ambehra, GSSS Nagalkalan, (4) PM Shree GSSS Amb, (5) GMS Chougath Sanhal, u/c GSSS Proiankalan (6) GMS Nagarwala u/c GSSS Jadla Education Block Gagret-I District Una, H.P., in the interest of justice and fair play” 2. During the course of the arguments, the learned 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 counsel for the petitioner submits that he shall be satisfied in case his representation dated 15.11.2025 (Annexure P-4) addressed to the Director Elementary Education Officer Lalpani, Shimla, is directed to be decided by the respondents-State. 3. Consequently, the respondents are directed to decide the representation as filed by the petitioner positively within a period of three weeks from today. Before passing any order, the petitioner shall be personally heard in the matter and thereafter the order, if any, shall be passed and same shall be communicated to him. 4. Needless to say, that this Court has not expressed anything on the merits of the case and the respondents are at liberty to take decision in accordance with law. 5. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application, if any. 12th February, 2026 ( Romesh Verma ) (Kiran) Vacation Judge