Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6659 (CHH)

POKHRAJ SINHA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRA/817/2026 · 2026-04-16

Shri Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:17665 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRA No. 817 of 2026 1 - Pokhraj Sinha S/o Panna Lal Sinha, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village- Saja, Police Station- Gunderdehi, District- Balod (C.G.). 2 - Raghunandan Sinha S/o Late Phool Singh Sinha, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Village- Saja, Police Station- Gunderdehi, District- Balod (C.G.). ... Appellants versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Station House Officer, Police Station- Gunderdehi, District- Balod (C.G.). ... Respondent For Appellants : Mr. Shikhar Sharma, Adv. For State : Mr. Vivek Mishra, P.L. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board 17 / 04 / 2026 1. The instant appeal under Section 14A (II) of the Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989 has been filed by the appellants being aggrieved by the impugned order dated 06.03.2026 passed by the learned Special Judge SC & ST (P.A.) Act, Balod, C.G., whereby the second bail application filed by the appellants under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with Crime No. 298/2025 registered at Police Station Gunderdehi, District-Balod (C.G.) for commission of offence punishable under Sections 296, 351(3), 115(2)/3(5) of BNS and Section 3(1) (d), 3(1)(K) and 3(2)(va) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, SOURABH PATEL Digitally signed by SOURABH PATEL Date: 2026.04.17 16:34:46 +0530 2 1989 has been rejected. 2. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants have been acquitted by the trial Court, therefore, the present appeal has become infructuous. 3. In view of submission made by learned counsel for the appellants, the present appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge Sourabh P.