2026:JHHC:10368 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No.908 of 2025 1. Kushal Horo, aged about 59 years Son of Late Mashiclas Horo, Resident of forest colony, P.O. & P.S. Sadar, District- Hazaribagh. 2. Kalyani Devi aged about 58 years, W/O Late Bimal Pandey, Resident of village Kahirgaon, P.O. Khivgaon, P.S. Sadar, District- Hazaribagh. 3. Mahesh Pandey, aged about 64 years Son of Late Krishna Pandey, Resident of village- Chandwar, P.O. Chandwar, P.S. Mufassil, District- Hazaribagh. 4. Doman Prasad Kushwaha, aged about 61 years Son of Late Subron Mahto, Resident of village- Ginga, P.O. Jhumra, P.S. Mufassil, District- Hazaribagh. 5. Bhagwan Pandey, aged about 63 years son of Late Chaman Pandey, Resident of village Jai Prabha Nagar, P.O. & P.S. Sadear, District- Hazaribagh. 6. Kishori Saw, aged about 68 years son of Late Nirmal Saw, resident of village-Lalpur Chowk, P.O. & P.S. Mufassil, District- Hazaribagh. 7. Rameshwar Saw, aged about 67 years son of Late Meghan Saw, Resident of Oriya, P.O. Oriya, P.S. Mufassil, District- Hazaribagh. 8. Galo Saw, aged about 65 years, son of Late Dhannu Sao, Resident of village Oriya, P.O. Oriya, P.S. Mufassil, District- Hazaribagh. 9. Satal Ram aged about 61 years Son of Late Kanshi Ram, Resident of village Sirsi, P.O. Sirsi, P.S. Katkamdag, District- Hazaribagh. 10. Lalo Hadi, aged about 62 years, son of Late Guru Charan Hadi, Resident of village- Korra, Р.О. Когга, P.S. Korra, District- Hazaribagh. 11. Chanda Devi aged about 72 years W/O Late Kripa Singh, Resident of village- Sarouni, P.O. & P.S. Sarouni, P.S. Mufassil, District- Hazaribagh. …. Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Sri Vimal Kumar Mishra, Registrar, Vinoba Bhave University, P.O. &P.S. Sadar, District- Hazaribagh. 3. Sudhir Bara, Director, Higher Education, Technical Department, 3rd floor, Yozna Bhavan, Nepal House, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, District- Ranchi. … Opp. Party(s) -------- CORAM: SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Binod Kr. Dubey, Advocate Mr. Arvind Prajapati, Advocate For the Opp. Party(s) : Mr. Aditya Raman, AC to GA-III Mr. Amresh Kumar, Advocate Ms. Riya Raj, Advocate ------ 2/10.04.2026 It is submitted by the respondent State that the order has been complied with, but the petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the 2026:JHHC:10368 2 respondents. 2. Considering the submission, I am not inclined to continue with this contempt petition. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the action to the respondents, it is open to the petitioner to challenge the same before appropriate Forum. 3. Accordingly, this contempt proceeding is dropped. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 10.04.2026 R.Kumar