( 2026:JHHC:10336 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 151 of 2026 ------ 1. Soma Rani Mondal @ Soma Rani Mandal, aged about 38 years, d/o Madhusudan Mandal, r/o House No.156, Gopalpur, Nala, P.O. & P.S.-Jamtara, Dist.-Jamtara, Jharkhand-815355 2. Madhusudan Mondal @ Madhusudan Mandal, aged about 77 years, s/o Bharat Chandra, r/o House No.156, Gopalpur, Nala, P.O. & P.S.-Jamtara, Dist.-Jamtara, Jharkhand-815355 3. Radha Rani Mondal @ Radha Rani Mandal, aged about 70 years, w/o Madhusudan Mondal, r/o House No.156, Gopalpur, Nala, P.O. & P.S.-Jamtara, Dist.-Jamtara, Jharkhand-815355 .... .... …. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary of the State of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, Dist.-Ranchi, Jharkhand-834004 2. Avijeet Gorain, aged about 40 years, s/o Ranjit Kumar Gorain, r/o Village-Rajpalli, near Hanuman Mandir, P.O. & P.S.-Jamtara, Dist.-Jamtara, Jharkhand-815355 .... .... .... Opp. Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Rajveer Singh, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Vandana Bharti, Addl. P.P. For O.P. No.2 : None ------ Order No.03 Dated- 10.04.2026 Heard the parties. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed at the instance of the petitioner for restoration of Cr.M.P. No. 484 of 2025 to its original file. No one turns up on behalf of the opposite party no.2 in-spite of repeated calls though notice has validly been served upon the opposite party no.2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Cr.M.P. No. 484 of 2025 was dismissed for non-prosecution. It is next submitted that as the counsel for the petitioner was suffering from fever hence, the counsel for the petitioner could not appear before this Court when the case was called out and the same resulted in dismissal of Cr.M.P. No. 484 of 2025. It is next submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said Cr.M.P. No. 484 of 2025 and unless Cr.M.P. No. 484 of 2025 is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that Cr.M.P. No. 484 of 2025 be restored to its original file. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, Cr.M.P. No. 484 of 2025 is restored to its original file to the stage at which, it was before its dismissal. List Cr.M.P. No. 484 of 2025 under the appropriate heading before the appropriate bench after a week. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 10.04.2026 Gunjan-