KAILASH CHANDRA MUKHERJEE v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cont.(Cvl)/816/2025 · 2026-04-17
Sanjay Prasad, Sujit Narayan Prasad
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6653 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6653 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:10947-DB
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Cvl.) No.816 of 2025
------ Kailash Chandra Mukherjee aged about 66 years son of Late Lakhan Chandra Mukherje resident of village Nabagram, P.O. Nidhi, P.S. Raghunathpur, District Purulia, West Bengal
…. …. Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Jharkhand.
2. Sri Sita Ram pandey Chairman Cum Managing Director M/s Bharat Coking Coal Limited, Office at Koyla Nagar, P.O. Koyla Nagar, P.S. Saraidhela, District Dhanbad.
3. Sri Samiran Dutta Chief Manager (P) MP & R, M/s Bharat Coking Coal Limited, Office at Koyla Nagar, P.O. Koyla Nagar, P.S. Saraidhela, District Dhanbad.
4. Sri Santosh Kumar Singh The General Manager (PF/Pension) M/s Bharat Coking Coal Limited, Office at Koyla Nagar, P.O. Koyla Nagar, P.S. Saraidhela, District Dhanbad.
5. Sri Santosh Kumar Singh The General Manager, M/s Bharat Coking Coal Limited. Office at Koyla Nagar, P.O. Koyla Nagar, P.S. Saraidhela, District Dhanbad.
6. Sri M.K Ramaish The Area Personnel Manager. M/s Bharat Coking Coal Limited, Govindpur Area III, P.O. and P.S. Govindpur, District Dhanbad.
7. Sri Vijay Kumar Mishra Regional Director, Coal Mines Provident Fund, Regional office D-II, Office at Hirapur, P.O. and P.S. Dhanbad, District Dhanbad. ..... .... Opp. Parties
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Akshya Kr. Mahato, Advocate
For the State
: Ms. Ruchi Mukti, AC to AAG-IA
For the BCCL : Mr. Anoop Kr. Mehta, Advocate
Mr. Shubham Malviya, Advocate
For the CMPF : Mr. Prashant Kr. Singh, Advocate
Mr. Karbir, Advocate
------
06/Dated: 17.04.2026
1. The instant contempt case has been filed for alleged, willful and deliberate non-compliance of the order dated 29.04.2025 passed in L.P.A. No.362 of 2024.
2. Mr. Anoop Kr. Mehta, learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Party-BCCL has submitted that the first direction which pertains to fixation of pension and its disbursement has already been complied with by depositing the part of contribution of the
2026:JHHC:10947-DB
2
employer in the P.F. account as well as pension account and the petitioner has also contributed the equal amount.
3. Mr. Prashant Kr. Singh, learned counsel for the Opp. Party-CMPF has also submitted that the order has been carried out.
4. Mr. Akshay Kr. Mahato, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the order in its letter and spirit has been complied with.
5. It appears from the documents which have been handed over to the petitioner that the decision for disbursement of the aforesaid amount has been taken. But the actual amount has yet to be received, since, it has not been deposited in the respective account of the petitioner.
6. Upon this, Mr. Prashant Kr. Singh, learned counsel for the Opp. Party-CMPF has submitted, based upon the aforesaid decision, that the amount, as has been settled, would be transmitted positively in the bank account of the petitioner in between the period from 1st May, 2026 to 15th May, 2026.
7. Let the total amount towards pension including arrears of pension amounting to Rs.7,63,677/- be paid.
8. Let the current pension amount to the tune of Rs.7,205/- be also paid on month-to-month basis.
9. Accordingly, the instant contempt case is closed and as such,
disposed of.
10. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
(Sanjay Prasad, J.) 17.04.2026 Rohit/-