Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 66527 (MAD)

MR. SHANMUGANAHANDAN SOUGOUMARANE v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP/4928/2026 · 2026-02-23

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 4928 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23-02-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 4928 of 2026 AND WMP NO. 5535 OF 2026 1. Mr. Shanmuganahandan Sougoumarane 2. Sankaralakshmi Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Chennai District Singaravelar maligai, Rajaji Salai, Chennai-600 001 2.The District Revenue officer Chennai District M. Singaavelar Maaligai, 63, Rajaji Salai, Chennai-600 001 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer Chennai South, Anna Salai, Little Mount, Guindy, Chennai-600 032 4.The Tahsildar Nol.45 Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Raj Nagar, Thoraipakkam, Chennai-600 097 Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the 4th Respondent to consider the representation 26.12.2025 and consequently directing the 4th Respondent to issue the correlation Report in respect of Survey No.Survey No.406/3A1A Okkiyam Thoraipakkam Village, within a stipulated time For Petitioner(s): Mr.G.M.Gokulram for M/s.The Ram Gokul Advocates and https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 4928 of 2026 Associates For Respondent(s): Mr.D.Ravichander,SGP For Respondent ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the fourth respondent to issue correlation report for the property in Survey No.406/3A1A and 1 B (part) within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2. The petitioner claims to be the owner of the aforesaid property. He has sought for correlation report from the fourth respondent through his representation dated 26.12.2025. Since the said representation has not been considered, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. 3. Mr. D.Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 4. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s representation as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with law within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 5. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 4928 of 2026 6. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the fourth respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s representation dated 26.12.2025, seeking for correlation report for the property in Survey No.406/3A1A and 1 B (part) within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is ordered subject to payment of single Court fee. 23-02-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No ab To 1.The District Collector Chennai District Singaravelar maligai, Rajaji Salai, Chennai-600 001 2.The District Revenue officer Chennai District M. Singaavelar Maaligai, 63, Rajaji Salai, Chennai-600 001 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer Chennai South, Anna Salai, Little Mount, Guindy, Chennai-600 032 4.The Tahsildar Nol.45 Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Raj Nagar, Thoraipakkam, Chennai-600 097 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 4928 of 2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 4928 of 2026 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab WP No. 4928 of 2026 AND WMP NO. 5535 OF 2026 23-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis