KAMLESH NAGAR, SON OF LATE SHRI MISHRILAL JI NAGAR v. SUMANT NAGAR, SON OF LATE SHRI MISHRILAL JI NAGAR
WMAP/40/2026 · 2026-03-27
Maneesh Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6652 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6652 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:13456] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No. 40/2026 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2392/2018 Kamlesh Nagar, S/o Late Shri Mishrilal Ji Nagar, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Sf-Ii, Neelkanth Apartment, A-164, Ramesh Marg, C- Scheme, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus
1. Sumant Nagar, S/o Late Shri Mishrilal Ji Nagar, R/o Plot No. 16, Durgapura, Near Pani Ki Tanki, Tonk Road, Jaipur
2. Madhusudan Nagar, S/o Late Shri Mishrilal Ji Nagar, R/o G-3, Geejgarh House, Nandpuri, Hawa Sadak, Jaipur
3. Chandrash Nagar, S/o Late Shri Mishrilal Ji Nagar, R/o G- 3, Geejgarh House, Nandpuri, Hawa Sadak, Jaipur
4. Aashish Nagar, S/o Late Shri Ramesh Nagar, R/o G-3, Geejgarh House, Nandpuri, Hawa Sadak, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohd. Adil For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mihir Katta for Mr. R.A. Katta HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 27/03/2026
1. The present civil miscellaneous application has been filed with a prayer that though the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn on 13.11.2025, but due to bona fide inadvertence, the presence of counsel for respondents could not be marked.
2. The aforesaid fact has not been opposed by the learned counsel for the applicant.
[2026:RJ-JP:13456] (2 of 2) [WMAP-40/2026]
3. For the reasons mentioned in the present application, the same is allowed.
4. In the order dated 13.11.2025, the presence of Mr. R.A. Katta and Mr. Mihir Katta may be read as counsel for the respondents.
(MANEESH SHARMA),J SOURAV /76