IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 26749 of 2025 In F/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION/50803/2025 In F/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION/26888/2025 ========================================================== CBI, BSFB, MUMBAI Versus SH BHARAT PRUSHOTTAM GAJJAR & ORS. ========================================================== Appearance: MR RC KODEKAR(1395) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR ROHAN RAVAL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 3 ========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL Date : 13/02/2026 ORAL ORDER 1. By this application under section 5 of the Limitation Act, the applicant seeks condonation of delay of 75 days caused in preferring the restoration application in main Criminal Revision Application which came to be dismissed for default for want of prosecution, for non-removing the o&ce objection. As this is an application for condonation of delay in restoration application, no notice is issued to the respondent nos.1 & 2. 2. Rule, returnable forthwith. Learned APP waives service of Rule. 3. Heard, the learned advocate for applicant. The learned advocate for the applicant, drawing attention of the Court to p. 2 the grounds for delay narrated in the application memo, states that su&cient cause has been made out for condonation of delay and accordingly, it is urged that the delay that has caused in preferring the restoration application in main Criminal Revision Application, may be condoned. 4. Having heard and considering the averments made in the memorandum of application, the Court is of the view that the delay that has occasioned in preferring the restoration application in main Criminal Revision Application has been su&ciently explained. The application, therefore, succeeds and is, accordingly, allowed. The delay caused in 0ling the restoration application in main Criminal Revision Application is hereby condoned. Rule is made absolute accordingly. (P. M. RAVAL, J) AMIT ITALIAN