Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6651 (MAD)

D.VIJAYAN v. The District Collector

WP/10805/2026 · 2026-03-26

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 10805 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 10805 of 2026 D.Vijayan S/o Dhanasekaran, No 1 Ponniamman Koil Street, Thirumangalam Kandigai, Kanchipuram District 602 106 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Thiruvallur District 2. The Revenue Divisional officer Thiruvallur District 3. The Tahsildar Thiruvallur District ..Respondent(s) Writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of Mandamus Directing the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the petitioner representations dated 02.03.2025, 08.09.2025, 15.09.2025, 17.09.2025, 10.11.2025 and remainder representation dated 23.02.2026 to the respondents requesting correction of the extent in the revenue records to reflected the actual extent of 640 square feet as per the assignement sketch and sale deed in survey No. 231-A / 20 Pudhumavilangi Vilalge, Tiruvallur Taluk, Tiruvallur Distrct, and pass orders. For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Prabakar For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Jayaprakash Govt.Advocate https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 10805 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to correct the revenue records with regard to the extent of the property more fully described in the prayer of this writ petition, based on the petitioner’s representations, 02.03.2025, 08.09.2025, 15.09.2025, 17.09.2025, 10.11.2025 and remainder representation dated 23.02.2026. 2. The petitioner had given various representations and the remainder representation on 23.02.2026 for the aforesaid purpose with the respondents. Since the same has not been considered, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. 3. Mr.C.Jaya Prakash, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 4. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the petitioner’s representation seeking for correction of extent of land, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, in the revenue records, is considered, on merits and in accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 5. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 10805 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 petitioner’s representation and remainder representation. 6. For the foregoing reasons, this Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the 2nd respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law, on the petitioner’s representations dated 02.03.2025, 08.09.2025, 15.09.2025, 17.09.2025, 10.11.2025 and remainder representation dated 23.02.2026, seeking for correcting the revenue records in respect of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, with regard to the property’s extent, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 26-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RKA To 1. The District Collector Thiruvallur District 2. The Revenue Divisional officer Thiruvallur District 3. The Tahsildar Thiruvallur District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 10805 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. RKA WP No. 10805 of 2026 26-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis