Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:HHC:7830 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Contempt Petition No.98 of 2024 Date of decision: 19.03.2026 Kanta Devi ….Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & Ors. ….Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr.Atharv Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy Advocates General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge(Oral): On the previous date, learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record instructions received from District Treasury Officer, Kangra at Dharamshala, in terms whereof, the pension arrears amounting to Rs. 78526/-, have been paid to the petitioner, as alleged therein.
2. Therefore, in view of the above, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same is closed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file execution, in case, she remains still aggrieved.
( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge March 19, 2026
(reena) 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement?