UDAY CONSTRUCTIONS CO. THROUGH BALASAHEB V GAIKWAD v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
WP/4383/2026 · 2026-09-01
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6642 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6642 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
DTG 34-Wp-4383-2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4383 OF 2026 Uday Constructions Co. … Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents _______________________________________ Mr. Girish Godbole, Senior Advocate i/b Mr. Tushar T. Chavan for Petitioner. Smt. P.P. Shinde, A.P.P. for Respondent-State. _______________________________________ CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND KAMAL KHATA, JJ. DATE : 1st September 2026 P.C. : 1) In view of Judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Sujal Vishwas Attavar and Anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors., reported in 2026 SCC OnLine SC 798, present Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for lodgment of FIR on the basis of complaint filed by the Petitioner with the concerned Police Authorities, is not maintainable. 1.1) Petition is accordingly disposed off.
( KAMAL KHATA, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. ) 1/1 DNYANESHWAR TULSHIRAM GHUMNAR Digitally signed by DNYANESHWAR TULSHIRAM GHUMNAR Date: 2026.09.07 16:52:51 +0530