Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6639 (JHR)

ARUN KUMAR @ YOGENDRA KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1667/2026 · 2026-04-16

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:10935] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1667 of 2026 1. Arun Kumar @ Yogendra Kumar aged about 20 years 2. Mishan Kumar aged about 24 years Both sons of Chetlal Mahto Resident of village- Harli P.Ο.-Harli P.S Barkagaon District -Hazaribag. ..... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Ankur Anand, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Sunil Kumar Dubey, A.P.P. ------ 03/ 16.04.2026 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that he is not pressing the prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioner No. 1 namely Arun Kumar @ Yogendra Kumar. 2. In view of his such submission, the prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioner No. 1 namely Arun Kumar @ Yogendra Kumar, is hereby, dismissed as not pressed. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner No. 2 and learned A.P.P for the State. 4. The petitioner No. 2 is apprehending his arrest in connection with Barkagaon P.S. Case No. 253 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 352, 351(3), 126(2) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Hazaribag. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that so far as petitioner No. 2 is concerned, only allegation is there that he was present at the spot and apart from that there is no allegation against him. [2026:JHHC:10935] -2- 6. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the allegation of making assault is there against the petitioner No. 1. 7. Looking into the contents of the FIR, it transpires that only allegation is there against the petitioner No. 2 that he was present at the spot and the allegation of making assault was against the petitioner No. 1, in that view of the matter, the petitioner No. 2, named above, is directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks from today and the learned Court shall release the petitioner No. 2 on such terms and conditions or the sureties as the learned Court may deem fit and proper. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-16.04.2026 Amitesh/-