Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6639 (CHH)

KARTAR SINGH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

REVP/96/2026 · 2026-04-19

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

Review Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(Rev.Pet.No.96/2026) 2026:CGHC:17840 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR REVP No. 96 of 2026 {Arising out of order dated 14-1-2026 passed in WP(S)No.4109/2019} Kartar Singh, S/o Likhan Singh, aged about 65 years, Occupation Retired Revenue Inspector at Municipal Corporation, Korba, Distt. Korba (C.G.) (Applicant) ... Petitioner versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Nagriya Prasasan Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2. Additional Secretary, Nagriya Prasasan Avam Vikas Vibhag, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 3. Director, Nagriya Prasasan Avam Vikas Vibhag, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 4. Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Korba, Distt. Korba (C.G.) 5. Collector, Korba, Distt. Korba (C.G.) ... Respondents Single Bench: - Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order (In Chamber) 20/04/2026 1. The above-stated review petition is taken-up for consideration in Chamber in view of Rule 90(2) of the High Court of Chhattisgarh Rules, 2007 (for short, ‘the Rules of 2007’). SISTA SOMAYAJULU Digitally signed by SISTA SOMAYAJULU Date: 2026.04.20 17:59:20 +0530 (Rev.Pet.No.96/2026) 2. I have gone through the review petition and the annexed documents. 3. After going through the record of the review petition and the documents annexed therewith and also the order under review, I do not find any error apparent on the face of record warranting review of the order dated 14-1-2026 passed by this Court in W.P.(S) No.4109/2019. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed in limine in terms of Rule 90(2) of the Rules of 2007 finding no sufficient cause for review of the order under review. No order as to cost(s). Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Soma