[2026:RJ-JP:14066] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5031/2026 Sachin S/o Satto, R/o Jatoli Ghana, Police Station Sewar, District Bharatpur, Raj. (Presently Confined At Central Jail Sewar, Bharatpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Raghav For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP Mr. Navankur Dubey HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 06/04/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.764/2025 registered at Police Station Mathuragate, District Bharatpur for offences under Sections 119(1), 333, 189(2), 351(2), 351(3), 115(2), 126(2) and 303(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the name of the present petitioner does not find mention in the FIR. No specific act has been attributed to him. It is further submitted that none of the injuries allegedly sustained by the complainant are on any vital part of the body, and there is no [2026:RJ-JP:14066] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5031/2026] medical opinion on record to suggest that the said injuries are dangerous to life. Co-accused-Dinesh Singh, Ramveer Singh, Satish @ Ramratan and Ajeet have been enlarged on bail by this Court on 25.03.2026. The case of the present petitioner is akin to them. Petitioner is behind the bars since 24.12.2025. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Sachin S/o Satto, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/49