Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 66321 (MAD)

N.Palanivel v. The Inspector General of Registration

WP/3162/2026 · 2026-02-10

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 3162 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 3162 of 2026 N.Palanivel S/o.Nallamuthu, No.1/79, Vivekananda College Opposite, Veerachipalayam Village, Sankagiri, Salem District- 637 303. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Inspector General of Registration O/o.The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome High Road, Chennai. 2. The District Registrar O/o.District Registrar Office, Erode District, Erode. 3. The Sub Registrar Sub Registrar Office, Kumarapalayam, Erode District. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned refusal check slip in RFL / Kumarapalayam/ 217/ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 3162 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 2025 dated - 30.12.2025 issued by the 3rd respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently directing the 3rd respondent to accept and register the partition deed document dated 08.12.2025 presented by the petitioner. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Kalaiyarasan For Respondent(s): Mr.U.Baranidharan, Special Government Pleader *********** ORDER Tracing title from sale deed dated 28.01.1977 bearing Document No.67 of 1977 and sale deed dated 05.06.1977 bearing Document No.1432 of 1977, the petitioner presented a partition deed for registration. The request for registration was declined by citing the decree in O.S.No.85 of 2010. 2. Mr.U.Baranidharan, learned Special Government Pleader, accepts notice for all the respondents. By referring to the decree, he points out that lands in Survey Nos.252/11 and 252/14 are covered by the decree. Therefore, he submits that the refusal is fully justified. 3. In response, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the partition deed also covers items 3 and 4 pertaining to Survey Nos.252/7 and 252/8, which https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 3162 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 are not dealt with in the decree. He seeks leave to execute and present a document pertaining thereto. 4. Out of the items of property forming the subject of the partition deed, it appears that two items, namely land in Survey Nos.252/11 and 252/14 are covered by the decree. Therefore, there is no reason to interfere with the impugned order. By leaving it open to the petitioner to execute and present a document pertaining to the third and fourth items mentioned in the partition deed, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 10-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RNA To 1. The Inspector General of Registration O/o.The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome High Road, Chennai. 2. The District Registrar O/o.District Registrar Office, Erode District, Erode. 3. The Sub Registrar Sub Registrar Office, Kumarapalayam, Erode District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 3162 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. RNA WP No. 3162 of 2026 10-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis