[2026:RJ-JP:12848] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1386/2026 Tasleem S/o Juhur, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Aalimev, Police Station Baheen, District Palwal (Haryana) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Jhunjhunu). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1866/2026 Robin S/o Ishab @ Chauda, Age 39 Years, R/o Aalimev, Police Station Baheen, District Palwal, Haryana. (Currently In District Jail, Jhunjhunu). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aslam S. Khan Mr. Harendra Singh Mr. Shivam For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 27/03/2026 1. These bail applications have been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 251/2025 registered at Police Station Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu for the offence(s) under Section(s) 132, 109(1), 324(3), 3(5) of BNS and under Section 3 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act. [2026:RJ-JP:12848] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1386/2026] 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and the accused-petitioners are behind the bars since 17.12.2025. He further submits that charge-sheet against the accused-petitioners has already been filed and conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioners in custody and therefore, prays that the accused-petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that there are 9 criminal antecedents instituted against the accused-petitioner Robin S/o Ishab @ Chauda. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties that the accused-petitioners are behind the bars since 17.12.2025 and charge-sheet against the accused-petitioners has already been filed and trial will take its own time. Without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners namely Tasleem S/o Juhur and Robin S/o Ishab @ Chauda are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court [2026:RJ-JP:12848] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1386/2026] to which the matter is transferred on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not be involved in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and they shall mark their presence on 1st and 15th day of every month in the concerned police station. 7. In case of any breach of the afore-mentioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner(s) for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J KAVISH /18-19