Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6630 (JHR)

BOUDHA JALASHAYA MATASAYA JIVI SAHYOG SAMITI LIMITED, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY MAHAVIR SAW v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/183/2025 · 2026-04-17

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:10985] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 183 of 2025 Boudha Jalashaya Matasaya Jivi Sahyog Samiti Limited, Khambhawa, through its Secretary Mahavir Saw, aged about 71 years, Son of Nanku Saw, Resident of Village- Khambhawa, P.O. & P.S.- Tatijharia, District- Hazaribag. ..... … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Umesh Prasad, Son of not known to the petitioner, District Cooperative Society, Hazaribag, Resident at P.O., P.S. & District - Hazaribag (not respondent in the writ petition). 3. Kishori Mahto, Son of Late Gambhir Mahto, Resident of Village Boudha, P.O. & P.S. Tatijharia, District Hazaribag. ..... … Opposite Parties -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. S.H. Haque, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Sonal Tiwari, A.C. to A.G. ------ 07/ 17.04.2026 From the show cause, filed on behalf of the opposite party, it transpires that Annexure-A is the document, by which, the representation of the petitioner has already been decided. 2. In view of the above, it transpires that the order of the writ court has been substantially complied with. As such, this contempt proceeding is dropped and the petition is disposed of. 3. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he may take recourse under the law. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-17.04.2026 Amitesh/-