Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6630 (ALL)

ARUN v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/31981/2026 · 2026-09-08

Krishan Pahal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 31981 of 2026 Court No. - 68 (Sr. No.110 out of 318) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Beerendra Singh Pal, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Pankaj Srivastava, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.53 of 2026, under Sections 109(1) BNS and Section 3/25/27 Arms Act, Police Station Rajpur, District Kanpur Dehat, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is a police party firing no injury case, rather the applicant sustained gunshot injury in the crossfire by the police. The criminal history assigned to the applicant has been explained. He is in jail since 6.5.2026. He undertakes to cooperate with the trial and not misuse the liberty of bail. 5. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application but the submissions raised by the learned counsel for the applicant could not be disputed. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, taking into consideration the fact that no injury has been sustained by any police Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Beerendra Singh Pal Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Arun .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) personnel, rather the applicant sustained injury in the crossfire, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima-facie the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant- Arun, be released on bail in the aforementioned case crime on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required. 8. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. September 9, 2026 Vikas Verma BAIL No. 31981 of 2026 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIKAS VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad