2026:JHHC:11094 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.1224 of 2026 Kuldeep Das @ Kuldip Kumar Das, aged about 27 years, S/o Late Nunuram Das, R/o Village- Charpa, PO and PS- Madhupur, District- Deoghar, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … Opp. Party --- CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate Mr. Prathik, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Ruby Pandey, APP --- 03/17.04.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 05.12.2025 in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.163 of 2025 for the offences registered under Sections 319 (2), 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) & 61(2) of the B.N.S. 2023 and sections 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) & 84 (C) of the Information Technology Act, pending in the court of learned Addl. Judge-II- cum- Special Judge, Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 05.12.2025 and he has no criminal antecedent of any cyber crime. 4. He has further submitted that no victim has been identified in the present case. 5. He has further submitted that similarly situated co-accused persons, Faizan Ansari @ Fezan @ Faijan Ansari and Shams Tabrej Ansari have been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide both order dated 26.02.2026 passed in B.A. No.799 of 2026 an B.A. No.882 of 2026. Further another co-accused, Riyaz Ansari has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 09.03.2026 passed in B.A. No.1077 of 2026. He has also submitted that one co-accused, Balram Kumar Das has preferred bail application vide B.A. No.1525 2026:JHHC:11094 2 of 2026 whose prayer for bail has been rejected with liberty to renew his prayer after framing of charge. 6. Learned counsel for the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer and has not disputed the submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioner. 7. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that petitioner has no criminal antecedent of cyber crime and no victim has been identified and similarly situated co-accused persons have been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, the petitioner above named is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. Judge-II- cum- Special Judge, Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar, in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.163 of 2025 on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 8. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e-mail. 9. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 17.04.2026 Uploaded on: ……….. sandeep/