POOJA GURJAR W/O BHAGCHAND GURJAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLW/470/2026 · 2026-03-28
Anil Kumar Upman
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6623 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6623 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:13226] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 470/2026
1. Pooja Gurjar W/o Bhagchand Gurjar, Aged About 21 Years, Resident of Gurjar Mohalla, Bhasoo, District Tonk, Presently Resident of Plot No. 175, Joravar Nagar, Nadi Ka Phatak, Jaipur (Raj.). Aadhar Card No. 7474-1551-4402
2. Bhagchand Gurjar Son of Sukhpal Gurjar, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Pannaheda Ka Rasta, Teelanju, District Tonk, Presently Resident Of Plot No. 175, Joravar Nagar, Nadi Ka Phatak, Jaipur (Raj.) Aadhar No. 5684-8880-2669 ----Petitioners Versus
1. State of Rajasthan through Principal Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Commissioner Of Police, Police Commissionerate, M.i. Road, Government Hostel Chauraha, Jaipur.
3. The Deputy Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur City (West), Jaipur.
4. SHO Police Station Murlipura, Jaipur City (West), Jaipur.
5. Ramlal Gurjar Son Of Bherurlal, Resident Of Gurjar Mohalla, Bhasoo, Tehsil Todaraysingh, District Tonk.
6. Bhula Devi W/o Ramlal Gurjar, Resident Of Gurjar Mohalla, Bhasoo, Tehsil Todaraysingh, District Tonk.
7. Rajesh Gurjar Son Of Ramlal Gurjar, Resident Of Gurjar Mohalla, Bhasoo, Tehsil Todaraysingh, District Tonk.
8. Pokhar Gurjar Son Of Ladu Gurjar, Resident Of Village Negtya, Tehsil Deoli, District Tonk.
9. Devraj Son Of Pokhar Gurjar, Resident Of Village Negtya, Tehsil Deoli, District Tonk.
10. Dinesh Son Of Pokhar Gujar, Resident Of Village Negtya, Tehsil Deoli, District Tonk. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Kharol For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shriram Dhakad, PP
[2026:RJ-JP:13226] (2 of 3) [CRLW-470/2026] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 28/03/2026
1. Defects pointed out by the registry are overruled.
2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel.
3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.5 to 10 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are major and they are mature enough to take decision of their life. Counsel submits that when the petitioner No.1 was minor, her marriage was solemnized with petitioner No.2 on 11.05.2022 in ‘Aata Sata Pratha’ but now, family members of the petitioner No.1 want to perform her marriage with another person against her will. In these circumstances, petitioner No.1 left her parental home and presently, she is residing with petitioner No.2. It is submitted that presently the petitioners are living in live-in- relationship and in this regard, affidavits dated 16.03.2026 have also been executed, which have been annexed with this petition.
Learned counsel further submits that petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection.
5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are
directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.4- Station House Officer, Police Station Murlipura,
[2026:RJ-JP:13226] (3 of 3) [CRLW-470/2026] Jaipur City (West), Jaipur and respondent No.4 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners.
6. The Criminal Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /120