[2026:JHHC:10430] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.3732 of 2025 ------ 1. Namo Devi (Age about 62 years) W/o Sri Gyani Singh 2. Banshidhar Kumar Singh @ Bansidhar Singh (Age about 40 years) S/o Sri Gyani Singh 3. Premlata Devi (Age about 35 years) W/o Sri Banshidhar Singh 4. Pashupati Singh (Age about 45 years) S/o Sri Dudheshwar Singh @ Khaitu Singh 5. Aman Singh @ Aman Kumar Singh (Age about 18 years) S/o Sri Banshidhar Kumar Singh All the Petitioners are resident of Village and P.O.- Bharkhar, P.S. -Dumri, District – Giridih, (Jharkhand) … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sri Baijnath Singh S/o Late Baleshwar Singh resident of Village and P.O.- Bharkhar, P.S. - Dumri, District Giridih (Jharkhand). … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Amit Kr. Verma, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vineet Kr. Vashistha, Spl. P. P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Mahesh Kr. Sinha (4), Advocate ------ Order No:-03 Dated:-10-04-2026 Heard the parties. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioners with the prayer for restoration of Cr.M.P. No.2200 of 2022 to its original file which stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 27.08.2025 passed by this Court. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that Cr.M.P. No.2200 of 2022 stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 27.08.2025 passed by this Court to file the proof of deposit of Rs.1,000/- with the Jharkhand State Legal Services Authority (JHALSA). It is next submitted that due to paucity of money, the said amount could not be deposited within the stipulated time which resulted in dismissal of the said Cr.M.P. No.2200 of 2022 for non-compliance of the said peremptory order dated 27.08.2025passed by this Court. It is further submitted that the said amount has already been deposited and the proof of the same has also been filed. It is next submitted that non-compliance of the said peremptory order dated 27.08.2025 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioners have very good grounds to agitate in the said Cr.M.P. No.2200 of 2022 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioners will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the Cr.M.P. No.2200 of 2022 be restored to its original file. Learned Spl.P.P. appearing for the State and the learned counsel for the opposite party No.2 have not raised any serious objection. Considering the facts of the case and the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, Cr.M.P. No.2200 of 2022 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal. Registry is directed to list Cr.M.P. No.2200 of 2022 before the concerned Bench after a week. This criminal miscellaneous petition is disposed of accordingly. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-10.04.2026-Animesh/