Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL MP No. 3397 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN CRL MP No. 3397 of 2026 in CRL A No. 469 of 2023 P.Anandhan ..Petitioner(s) Vs State by, The Inspector of Police, AWPS, Neyveli Police Station, Cuddalore District. Cr.No.19 of 2021. ..Respondent(s) CRL A No. 469 of 2023 P.Anandhan ..Appellant(s) Vs State Rep By The Inspector Of Police, AWPS,Neyveli Police Station, Cuddalore District. Cr.No.19/2021. ..Respondent(s) CRL MP No. 3397 of 2026 To modify the bail condition that to executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five thousand only) with two sureties, imposed in Crl.MP.No.18689 of 2023 in Crl.A.No.469 of 2023, dated 25.10.2025.
CRL A No. 469 of 2023 To call for the records and set aside the conviction and sentence imposed against the appellant on 23.08.2022 in Spl SC no. 85/2021 on the file of the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL MP No. 3397 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 Special Court for Exclusive trial of cases under POCSO act, Cuddalore District and acquit the appellant CRL MP No. 3397 of 2026 For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Pugalenthi For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Balaji Government Advocate(criminal Side)
Order The petitioner seeks modification of the condition imposed by this Court while suspending the sentence on 25.10.2025. This Court had inter alia passed the following condition;
"(a) the petitioner/accused is ordered to be released on bail, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties, in which one surety shall be a blood related surety, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Special Court for Exclusive Trial of cases under POCSO Act, Cuddalore" 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that though the
order was passed on 25.10.2025, the petitioner is unable to execute the surety as the learned Sub Judge is insisting on property document to prove the worth of the petitioner. 3.This Court is of the view that the said condition is onerous. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL MP No. 3397 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 4.Therefore, the learned Sub Judge may not insist on any property document and may permit the petitioner to comply with the condition imposed by this Court and obtain a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- from him, with two sureties, of which, one surety shall be his son. 5.With the above modification, the petition is ordered. 26-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No TSG To 1.The Inspector of Police, Cuddalore, AWPS Neyveli Police Station, Cuddalore District. Crime No.19/2021. 2.The Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Cuddalore District. 3.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Cuddalore. 4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL MP No. 3397 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SUNDER MOHAN J. TSG CRL MP No. 3397 of 2026 in CRL A No. 469 of 2023 26-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis