Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6621 (HP)

VINOD MANTA v. STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER

CWP/3013/2026 · 2026-03-19

Ajay Mohan Goel

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:HHC:7746 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 3013 of 2026 Decided on: 19.03.2026 Vinod Manta …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General for respondents – State. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has filed a representation, which is appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-2, dated 07.11.2025, for his adjustment at a station which is likely to fall vacant on 31.03.2026. He further submitted that petitioner is going to superannuate within 10 months. Accordingly, he submitted that the respondents/competent authority be directed to decide the representation filed by the petitioner by 31.03.2026. Ordered Accordingly. Let the 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:7746 representation of the petitioner, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-2, dated 07.11.2025, be decided on or before 31.03.2026 sympathetically and if possible, the petitioner be adjusted at the station to which he is seeking his transfer if there is no administrative impediment in his adjustment at said station. The writ petition stands disposed of in above terms. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge March 19, 2026 (narender)