Page 1 of 3. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No.967 of 2026 Ashok Kumar Bhoi ..... Petitioner Represented by Adv. - Sapan Kumar Pal -versus- Vice Chancellor, Revenshaw University Cuttack & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Represented by Adv. – C.M. Singh, A.S.C. CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA ORDER 13.01.2026 Order No. 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode). 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State-Opposite Parties. Perused the writ petition as well as documents annexed thereto. 3. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: “The petitioner, therefore prays that your Lordships may graciously be pleased to admit the Writ application and issue notice to the opp. party more particularly Opp party No -1 and 2 to file a show cause, Page 2 of 3. calling upon him as to why the writ of mandamus shell not be initiated and why the Hon'ble shell not be direction to issue to the Opp party to regularize petitioner service from the date of appointment to till date and disbursed all consequential service benefit and update service book with periodical increment in favoured of the petitioner as those who are appointed by the Opp parties 1998 they are regularize except petitioner.” 4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner may be granted liberty to file a fresh representation ventilating his grievance before the Director of Health Services Odisha, Bhubaneswar, Opposite Party No.2 which may be considered within a stipulated period of time in accordance with law. 5. Learned Additional Standing Counsel on the other hand submits that he has no objection if liberty is granted to the Petitioner to file a fresh representation before the Opposite Party No.2 and the same is considered and disposed of in accordance with law. 6. In view of the aforesaid limited nature of grievance of the petitioner, this Court disposes of the writ petition granting liberty to the Petitioner to file a fresh representation before the Opposite Party No.2 ventilating his grievance within a period of two weeks. If such representation is filed within the time stipulated, the same shall be considered and disposed of by the Opposite Party No.2 within a period of two months from the date of filing representation by passing a speaking and reasoned order. The decision so taken on the same shall be communicated to the Petitioner within a period of ten days from the date of taking such a decision. Page 3 of 3. 7. With the aforesaid observations/ directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application. ( A.K. Mohapatra) Judge Anil Designation: Junior Stenographer