AJIJUL HOQUE ALIAS MD AJIJUL HOQUE AND 2 ORS. v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
AB/27/2026 · 2026-03-23
Parthivjyoti Saikia
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 662 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 662 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010001622026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/27/2026 AJIJUL HOQUE ALIAS MD AJIJUL HOQUE AND 2 ORS. S/O. SAMSUL HOQUE, R/O. VILL. PANIZANI PT. I P.O. BHUMKA, P.S.- GOSSAIGAON DISTRICT - KOKRAJHAR, ASSAM 2: MENA KHATUN W/O. AZIZUL HOQUE R/O. VILL. PANIZANI PT. I P.O. BHUMKA P.S.- GOSSAIGAON DISTRICT - KOKRAJHAR ASSAM 3: AMINUL HOQUE S/O. AZIZUL HOQUE R/O. VILL. PANIZANI PT. I P.O. BHUMKA P.S.- GOSSAIGAON DISTRICT - KOKRAJHAR ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAN 2:MD ANSER ALI SK S/O. MUJAFFAR ALI VILLAGE NO.1 KURSHAKATI P/O. KAMALSHING P/S.GOSSAIGAON DIST. KOKRAJHAR BTC ASSAM PIN. 78333 Advocate for the Petitioner : , MR. M A MONDAL,MR. N UDDIN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MS. T PORASOR(AMICUS CURIAE, R2)
Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 24.03.2026 Heard Mr. N Uddin, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. D P Goswami, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State of Assam as well as Ms. T Porasor, the learned Amicus Curiae appearing for the respondent No.2. 2. This is an application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 praying for grant of pre- arrest bail to the petitioners, namely, 1, Ajijul Hoque @ Md. Ajijul Hoque, 2. Amena Khatun and 3. Aminul Hoque in respect of Gossaigaon P.S. Case No. 191/2025. 3. The petitioner No.3 Aminul Hoque, who is below 18 years of age, was having a love affair with a 14 years old girl. They had physical relationship also on multiple occasions. On one occasion the girl was taken to his house, where he took some obscene photographs of her. It is alleged in the FIR that the petitioner No. 3 Aminul Hoque had even uploaded those photographs in social media. 4. I have considered the submission made by the learned counsel of both sides. 5. The story relates to Aminul Hoque and a minor girl. It may be stated that Aminul Hoque himself is a minor boy. 6. Considering the aforesaid fact, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner No. 3 Aminul Hoque does not deserve to be detained in custody for the allegation brought against him. Therefore, his prayer for pre-arrest bail is allowed. 7.
It is hereby directed that in the event of arrest in connection with Gossaigaon P.S. Case No. 191/2025, the petitioner Aminul Hoque shall be released on bail of ₹25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with a surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority. 8. So far the prayer of the petitioner Nos. 1, Ajijul Hoque @ Md. Ajijul Hoque and petitioner No. 2 Amena Khatun are concerned, they are parents of Aminul Hoque. In the FIR, there are no allegation against them. Therefore, they do not deserve to be detained in custody. Therefore, their prayer for pre-arrest bail is allowed. 9. It is hereby directed that in the event of their arrest in connection with Gossaigaon
Page No.# 3/3 P.S. Case No. 191/2025, the petitioner Nos. 1, Ajijul Hoque @ Md. Ajijul Hoque and petitioner No. 2 Amena Khatun shall be released on bail of ₹25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority. With the aforesaid direction, the bail application is disposed of. The CD shall be returned. JUDGE Comparing Assistant