1 2026:CGHC:13737 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1873 of 2020 1 - Durg Jila Thok Upbhokta Sahakari Bhandar Maryadit Through Its Chief Executive Officer, Nirmal Kumar Verma, S/o Late Shri Jhabbu Lal Verma, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Shubham Kumjj, Surya Nagar, Sikola Bhata, Durg, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Food Supplies And Consumer Protection, Maanadi Bhawan Mantralay Atal Nagar, District- Raipur, (C.G.), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Director Of Food Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection, Block 2nd 3rd Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, Mantralay Atal Nagar, District- Raipur, (C.G.), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Collector (Food) Collectorate Office Durg District- Durg, (C.G.), District : Durg, Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Commissioner Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection Department Directorate Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection Block 2 RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 3rd Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, Mantralay Ata Nagar, District- Raipur, (C.G.), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Food Controller Durg Disrict- Durg, (C.G.), District : Durg, Chhattisgarh. 6 - The Sub Divisional Officer Durg, District- Durg, (C.G.), District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudhanshu Singh, Advocate on behalf Mr. B.P. Singh, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/ State : Mr. Arpit Agrawal, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 23/03/2026 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records relates with the Instant Petition. 10.2 The Hon'ble may kindly be pleased to quash the Order dated 13/07/2020 passed by the office of respondent no. 5 10.3 The Hon'ble may kindly be pleased to pass any other orders/direction that, this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty 3 to avail alternative remedy available under the law to file an appeal before the concerned authority. 3. No objection has been raised from other side. 4. Accordingly, the prayer is allowed and the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat